| 
    CLASSIFICATION
   AND RELATIONSHIPS  
   Hapaline has
      always occupied an anomalous position in the various proposed aroid
      classifications. Schott (1860) produced a family classification
      based primarily on floral characters. Paleotropical Hapaline
      went in otherwise neotropical subtribe Syngoninae of tribe Caladieae
      (including Caladium Vent., Syngonium Schott and Xanthosoma Schott);
      evidently he had realised Hapaline was rather different from
      the palaeotropical genera of his tribe Caladieae. Engler (1876a,
      1876b), working mainly with vegetative characters, redefined tribe
      Caladieae of his subfamily Colocasioideae, removing all but Caladium
      and Xanthosoma and not suggesting a placement for Hapaline.
      Engler (1879) expanded on this arrangement, including all genera
      known to him and placed Hapaline in tribe Caladieae. Engler
      maintained this classification for NatÙrlichen Pflanzenfamilien
      (Engler 1889) but by 1920 had reconsidered the generic position
      of Hapaline and recognized a new monogeneric subtribe, Hapalininae,
      (tribe Colocasieae: subfamily Colocasioideae), to emphasize the
      apparent isolation of the genus (Engler & Krause 1920). Grayum (1990)
      produced a classification based on a wider range of characters but
      retained Hapaline in much the same position as Engler. Bogner
      & Nicolson (1991) produced an essentially updated Englerian classification
      and did not alter the position of Hapaline from that of Engler
      (1920). Recently Mayo, Bogner & Boyce (in press) have undertaken
      a cladistic analysis of the Araceae as part of the ëGenera of Araceae‰
      project. This has radically altered the topography of Engler's suprageneric
      family classification. Some of Engler's subfamilies, including the
      Colocasioideae, have been dismantled. Hapaline is assigned
      to Caladieae, one of two tribes in the ëCaladium alliance‰ . Besides
      Hapaline, tribe Caladieae contains all the neotropical genera
      recognized by Engler in his subfamily Colocasioideae. The other
      palaeotropical genera of Engler's Colocasiodeae are placed in Colocasieae,
   one of 15 tribes for which no alliance has been established.  
    |